🔗 Share this article

A Danish man has been convicted of uploading sexually explicit segments from copyrighted movies and TV series on the social media site Reddit.

Based on a law enforcement report obtained by BBC News, the unnamed man shared 347 clips of explicit content in a subreddit he managed, which were then viewed 4.2 million-plus times.

The country's authorities confirm he has been given a seven-month suspended jail term for violating copyright laws.

Experts explain the defendant was prosecuted under a seldom-invoked clause in Danish intellectual property legislation, with the judge finding that by removing the footage out of their intended setting, the accused had harmed the artists' "ethical entitlements".

He has additionally been found guilty of distributing more than 25 TB of protected digital content.

From March 2022 to mid-2023, the man using the alias "KlammereFyr" on Reddit uploaded sexually explicit clips featuring over 100 female performers.

He shared them in the forum he was a administrator of.

Per the Danish copyright protection group The Rights Alliance (TRA), his online community had more than 6,000 subscribers and users were prompted to ask for clips of specific actors.

In last year, campaigners filed the incident to the authorities on behalf of the impacted artists, filmmakers and producers, which led to the subreddit being closed down.

Andrea Vagn Jensen, among the actresses whose explicit scenes were shared in the community, explained to local broadcasters at the period she felt there was a distinction between appearing naked in a movie and being shown on Reddit.

The performer said the posts amounted to "exploitation".

'A significant message'

The defendant was arrested in fall 2024 and pleaded culpable to the charges last month.

In a comment following the ruling, the head of the Rights Alliance the organization's leader said the outcome sent an "important" message "that infringements of artists' entitlements have repercussions".

The ruling is considered unique in the country for its use of the "ethical protections" clause of the national copyright law, which states an artist's work cannot be used in a way which infringes upon their reputation.

Copyright law expert Dr Alina Trapova informed BBC News the legal matter was "rare" for its focus on the harm to the dignity of an performer, rather than to them economically.

The extent to which the ruling could influence nations abroad is unclear.

But she said there may be "an increasing number of these actions" in the future with the growth of AI, where "the sanctity of one's creative output might be tempered with much more easily".